RH
Ryerson Holding Corp (RYI)·Q1 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 revenue was $1.24B, in line with guidance, on 497k tons and ASP of $2,493/ton, but EPS missed as Ryerson posted a diluted loss of $0.22; adjusted EBITDA ex-LIFO was $40.2M, below guidance, as gross margin contracted on stainless weakness and lagging higher-cost inventory through the quarter .
- Management initiated a pivot from investment to optimization, announcing $40M annualized cost reductions (≈$25M to be realized over the balance of 2024) while completing a multi-year ERP unification across 31 service centers and starting up the 900k sq. ft. University Park, IL facility .
- Balance sheet remained liquid ($684M global liquidity) but net leverage rose to 2.5x (above 0.5–2.0x target) driven by working capital build and lower EBITDA; debt and net debt increased to $497M and $455M, respectively .
- Q2 outlook: shipments +1–3% q/q, net sales $1.25–$1.29B, ASP +0–1%, LIFO expense ~$1M, adjusted EBITDA ex-LIFO $47–$53M, EPS $0.15–$0.25; management cites stabilization in carbon and improving bright metals indices as potential catalysts .
- Catalysts: cost-out execution, value-added mix benefits, pricing stabilization in stainless/aluminum, and ERP-enabled service improvements; constraints include counter-cyclical market conditions and near-term margin sensitivity to spot pricing and inventory cost lags .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Completed ERP unification across 31 service centers and commenced operations at University Park IL; modernization and automation initiatives aimed at operating leverage and customer experience improvements .
- Sequential improvement in adjusted EBITDA ex-LIFO to $40.2M from $25.9M, with gross margin ex-LIFO expanding 70 bps to 17.6% as value-added fabrication sales grew and ASPs outpaced COGS for the sales mix .
- Outperformed industry volumes; North American shipments increased 13.7% q/q vs. 7% for MSCI, with strength in transportation, construction equipment, and industrial manufacturing .
-
What Went Wrong
- EPS miss and margin compression: diluted EPS of $(0.22) and adjusted EPS of $(0.18) missed guidance due to stainless price pressure, higher-cost inventory lag, and transitory investment-related operating expenses; GAAP gross margin fell 460 bps q/q to 17.6% (LIFO swing vs. Q4) .
- Net leverage rose to 2.5x (above the 0.5–2.0x target) as operating cash flow was $(47.8)M on working capital build (inventory/receivables) amid service level improvement objectives .
- Stainless pricing and channel inventory overhang compressed margins; management noted the need for several months of price momentum to sustainably improve spot margins .
Financial Results
Revenue and EPS vs Estimates (S&P Global consensus unavailable today)
Comparative P&L and Profitability
KPI and Balance Sheet Metrics
Product Mix – Net Sales, Shipments, ASP
Notes: Q4 LIFO income was significant and accounted for the sequential gross margin delta vs Q1 (Q4 LIFO income $59.3M vs Q1 LIFO expense $1.0M) .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We… mark two important milestones: the start of operations at our University Park, IL service center and the completion of the final stage of our ERP system unification program across 31 service centers… creating Ryerson’s next generation operating model” .
- “We met our guidance range for revenue and shipments but missed on earnings per share and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO… due to lower than expected gross margins… and transitory operating expenses…” .
- “It is now the appropriate time to transition to an investment, integration and optimization phase… targeting $40 million in annual cost take-outs… ~$25 million in savings during the balance of 2024” .
- “We expect volumes to be up… Q2 revenues $1.25–$1.29 billion… adjusted EBITDA ex-LIFO $47–$53 million and EPS $0.15 to $0.25” .
- “Due to… business investments and strategic inventory positioning… we exceeded our 2x target range for net leverage… we reiterate our commitment to our long-term range of 0.5 to 2x net leverage” .
Q&A Highlights
- Cost savings cadence: ~$25M realized over Q2–Q4’24; annualized $40M exiting 2024 into 2025 .
- 2025 capex normalization: ~$50M in 2025, with maintenance capex ~$30–$35M; remaining growth projects to finish with attractive ROIs .
- ERP conversion status: Essentially complete across the network (except recent bolt-ons); expect benefits as conversions move past the disruptive phase .
- Acquisition profitability: Majority are profitable; margin compression more about commodity curves and spot competitiveness than M&A drag .
- Pricing dynamics: Need 2–4 months of sustained price momentum for spot margins to improve; risk of “double squeeze” if prices tick up then fall back .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q1 2024 EPS and revenue was unavailable today; comparisons vs consensus cannot be provided. Management’s prior Q1 guidance implied adjusted EBITDA ex-LIFO of $58–$62M and EPS of $0.24–$0.34, while actuals were $40.2M and $(0.22), respectively, reflecting margin compression and transitory costs .
- Q2 2024 guidance (adjusted EBITDA ex-LIFO $47–$53M; EPS $0.15–$0.25) suggests modest sequential improvement; estimate models may need to reflect lower stainless ASPs, higher-cost inventory lag, cost-out benefits ramping through 2H, and stable LIFO assumptions (~$1M expense) .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution pivot: The investment phase (ERP/start-ups) is largely complete; $40M annualized cost reductions are a tangible earnings bridge into 2H’24/2025 as modernization benefits are monetized .
- Margin sensitivity: Stainless pricing and inventory cost lag drove the Q1 miss; sustained price momentum over several months is needed to lift spot margins and EBIT conversion .
- Liquidity intact, leverage near-term elevated: $684M liquidity supports operations and optimization; expect leverage normalization as cost-outs flow and WC unwinds .
- Mix and value-add: Continued progress on value-added capabilities and network ERP integration supports higher, less volatile through-cycle earnings once pricing stabilizes .
- Near-term setup: Q2 guide implies incremental improvement; watch for execution on $25M 2024 cost savings, stainless/aluminum price traction, and volume seasonality into summer .
- Capital deployment: 2024 capex at ~$110M then normalizing to ~$50M in 2025, maintaining dividend and opportunistic buybacks within leverage guardrails .
- Risk factors: Prolonged counter-cycle or renewed price declines could delay margin recovery and leverage normalization; competitive pricing intensity remains high .